On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Benjamin Poulain <benja...@webkit.org>wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: > I would go for something verbose in a easy to understand format. E.g. { test: 'fast/html/keygen.html', > platform: 'mac, linux', > bug: 'webkit.org/b/66666', > expectedResults: ['crash', 'text', 'image'], > action: 'skip' } For the tests that need rebaseline or new results, I would leave them > out of the file. I would use an second file, with entries sorted by bug > number. > > I don't know all the problems related to test_expectations so that is > just some ideas from what I encountered in the past. > As far as I know, a lot of people edit this file on a text editor so the syntax needs be simple enough for that. Also, complex syntax tends to be error-prone. One of the pain points of the current syntax is that many people forget to add : and =, or put modifiers in where expectations appear and vice versa. - Rysouke
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev