Great job guys!
Your approach sounds good. Can you upload an overall patch (not for
review) to the main bug?
Then we can easily test your solution and see the overall complexity
change of the patch.
I will test the patch on Qt and keep in touch.
Regards,
<Zoltan>
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:30:51 +0200, KwangYul Seo <sk...@company100.net>
wrote:
Hi,
Our team at Company 100 has worked on parallel image decoders for past a
few weeks and some patches are pending for review now. Here is the master
bug for parallel image decoders:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90375
For the overall architecture and design, please refer to the following
design document. We will update the design document as we change code
after
review.
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=12gf7MhNHfupeR3GdRF-h2Vzg86viCbwXq8_JByHKlg0
Our implementation shows considerable speedup in image intensive sites
and
no performance regression in PLT. Please refer to the master bug for
specific numbers.
We do understand many paralleization techniques make code so complex to
the
level that can't be accepted. So we tried our best to reduce the
complexity
of code, but reviewers can help us reduce it further.
Regards,
Kwang Yul Seo
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
