On Jul 19, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Antti Koivisto <akoivi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> kirjoitti 20.7.2012 kello 0.27:
>
>>
>> In principle, we could also have this support multiple arguments, so you
>> could write:
>>
>> debug("frame: ", someFrame, " node: ", someNode, " string", someString);
>
> I think this is the way to go for the easy syntax. A format string version
> should also be available.
I'm totally on board with this, too.
~Brady
>
>
> antti
>
>>
>> This would be no more verbose than the << style, but could compile to a
>> single function call at the call site and therefore could be relatively
>> compact. I would find this easier to deal with than a unary function or a
>> printf-style format string. The way you'd do this is by defining template
>> functions which call a unary overloaded function for each argument:
>>
>> template<typename A, typename B> debug(A a, B b)
>> {
>> debug(a);
>> debug(b);
>> }
>>
>> template<typename A, typename B, typename C> debug(A a, B b, C c)
>> {
>> debug(a);
>> debug(b);
>> debug(c);
>> }
>>
>> template<typename A, typename B, typename C, typename D> debug(A a, B b, C
>> c, D d)
>> {
>> debug(a);
>> debug(b);
>> debug(c);
>> debug(d);
>> }
>>
>> ... and so on up to some reasonable number of arguments.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Maciej
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
