On Oct 9, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Adam Barth <aba...@webkit.org> wrote: > > That raises the question of what the cache-size to hit-rate curve > looks like. I don't think that's something we've ever measured for > the MemoryCache, but it would be interesting to know, for example, > whether increasing the cache size by 4% increases the cache hit rate > by more or less than 4%.
My guess is that frequency of hits on given cache items approximately follows a power law distribution, and therefore increasing cache size gives diminishing returns. The question you raise is ceratainly an interesting one to study to determine the optimum cache size, and to revisit when improvements are made to cache efficiency. But with respect to the proposed improvement under discussion: If you imagine this as a curve with hit rate on the Y axis and cache size required to achieve that hit rate on the X axis, then the potential improvement under discussion would shift the curve down (assuming the 4% redundancy level holds across the typical user's working set). In economic terms, you can think of this as shifting the supply curve down (more hit rate can be supplied at any given cost in memory), rather than movement along the supply curve. Which is pretty good for you regardless of your demand curve (your willingness to pay memory use for cache hit rate). Regards, Maciej _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
