On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Timothy Hatcher <timo...@apple.com> wrote: > >> As I replied before, there should only be one attribute — srcset. > > I have a serious suggestion - could we rename srcset to src-n > (literally, "src-n"), and then just ship it? This puns in three > interesting ways: > > 1. If src-N is never accepted, it's still an attribute that holds N > src values, so src-n works well. > 2. If src-N is accepted, but as a single attribute, src-n is just > named perfectly to match the proposal name. > 3. If src-N is accepted fully, the obvious ordering is clearly src-1, > src-2, src-3, ..., src-n, which matches the fallback we want. > > A guaranteed "last fallback" is legitimately useful for the full src-N > proposal, so I'm totally okay with integrating that into my proposal. > > This'll let us ship now, and then continue to discuss src-N for a > while, with whatever solution we land on still having a consistent > name. Win for authors no matter what the result is. No, you are just asking for support to muddy the waters and make the web your science project. — Timothy Hatcher _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
