On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl>
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote:
>> > I understand your concern and sentiment but I'm having a hard time
>> imagining
>> > what kind of problems/concerns would TC39 have with these interfaces
>> that
>> > are clearly prefixed with DOM.
>> That if they end up as objects in JavaScript engines they end up
>> leaking outside of browsers affecting other parts of the JavaScript
>> ecosystem. (And actually, we do run new APIs by TC39 for review, so if
>> these have passed for review on public-script-co...@w3.org, perhaps
>> calling out this implementation tactic, that might be sufficient.)
> If that were the concern, we can simply add a private API that WebCore
> uses to enable these objects at run time.

Having said that, it would be much cleaner to improve our binding code and
do it in WebCore.

- R. Niwa
webkit-dev mailing list

Reply via email to