> On Jan 28, 2015, at 8:44 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@igalia.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote: >> Yet another possibility is finding a better name than ‘shared’ for the >> singleton pattern function, but I don’t have any better ideas. >> Class::getSingleton() is more explicit but the extra verbosity doesn’t seem >> helpful to me. > > I recommend Class::instance(), which is what I've seen used almost > exclusively outside of WebKit. It's what Scott Meyers used, and it's very > similar to the Gang of Four's choice of Class::Instance() and the Java > pattern Class.INSTANCE.
I've seen this, also. It's a good name. > > That said, Class::singleton() is very attractive too. :-) > > I've never seen Class::shared() used anywhere except WebKit. The first time I > saw this I had no clue what it was until I looked up the implementation. +1 > > All of these can get quite annoying to type, especially when the name of the > class is long. (Sometimes I will keep a reference to the instance in a local > variable with a shorter name.) But I think they're easier to read than free > functions, and we should optimize for reading code, not writing it. Not a big > deal either way. > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
