I indeed think this will require “using” statements or explicit namespace at 
call sites.

I don’t think anonymous namespaces are suitable for resolving naming conflicts 
due to unity builds since the functions and up in the same compilation unit.

--
 Chris Dumez




> On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Darin Adler <da...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> How does this work? Without a “using” how does it know to search this 
> namespace? Is this superior to using anonymous namespaces instead of “static”?
> 
> — Darin
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to