On Jan 27, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Jan 26, 2006, at 8:34 PM, David D. Kilzer wrote:
It would be nice to have a "Meta" keyword for
bugzilla.opendarwin.org so that meta (tracking/master) bugs like
these could be flagged as such:
http://bugzilla.opendarwin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6851
http://bugzilla.opendarwin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3356
http://bugzilla.opendarwin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6627
http://bugzilla.opendarwin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6519
http://bugzilla.opendarwin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6622 [speculating
this will evolve into meta bug]
See the description for "meta" on bugzilla.mozilla.org:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/describekeywords.cgi
I don't mind adding a keyword. But I'm not found of the word "meta"
for this purpose. Something like "IsBugCollection" might be more in
keeping with our other keywords.
It would be fine to mark a bug that's a collection of other bugs as
such, but why is a keyword helpful for this? Will we use this
keyword to create queries?
In OS X, the term "master bug" is often used. Another possibility
would be "tracking bug". I think TrackingBug or MasterBug would be
ok, but are probably unnecessary for reasons stated. A "MASTER:"
prefix in the title might be sufficient. We are trying to be careful
and not overdo the keywords, so we keep a small useful set.
Regards,
Maciej
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
