I think it's also important to weigh potential new security vulnerabilities as well. My understanding is that image decoders have been a source of issues in the past. Can we find an example of a single page with JPEG-XR images embedded into the page content?
--Martin On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Michael Catanzaro <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 10:59 +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote: >> This might just be a chicken-egg problem, though: Why should any >> distribution bother with packaging it, if no application uses it? > > And why would any sane web site use the format, if there exists one > major browser that does not support it? Chicken and egg again. The > decision on which formats to support should not be based on what web > sites are currently using. > > I am very skeptical of a format that has been rejected by both Chrome > and Firefox, though. I don't see why any sites would want to use such a > format, regardless of what we do. > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-gtk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk _______________________________________________ webkit-gtk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk
