01.03.2017, 20:10, "Andrea Giammarchi" <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com>: > Chiming in, it'd be awesome to be able to test WASM on 2.16 behind a flag, > I'm targeting mostly SBC including Raspberry Pi 0 where WebKitGTK+ already > works like a charm (enabling WebGL and with HW accelerated layers) but I > can't compare performance against WASM and building from scratch targeting Pi > Zero ain't the easiest thing to do.
AFAIU Zero is based on 32-bit ARM, and WASM requires B3 that is 64-bit only. > > Thanks for eventual consideration. > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Yusuke SUZUKI <utatane....@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Saam Barati <sbar...@apple.com> wrote: >>> On Mar 1, 2017, at 7:46 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@igalia.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 15:44 +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: >>>> We have recently branched for 2.16 so it's a perfect moment to enable >>>> it in trunk with very little risk. >>>> >>>> Is Apple planning to enable it within the next six months? If so, now >>>> is indeed the ideal time to enable it for WebKitGTK+. >>> >>> What do you mean by enable it? It's been on by default on the Mac port for >>> a while now and has been in the various STP releases. >>> >>> I think it's a good idea to enable it on other ports too. Note that Keith >>> is currently working on a patch to make loads faster in Wasm. It may >>> require some OS specific handling to run well on Linux: >>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162693 >> >> Awesome! I think enabling WASM on Linux after landing Keith's faster memory >> access patch (by using SEGV signal handling instead of bound checking) is >> good. >> Once that patch is implemented and landed, we can start implementing >> platform-specific part of that (extracting instruction pointer from >> mcontext_t and signal handling part should be implemented for Linux). >> I think that should be easy (since retrieving instruction pointer from >> mcontext_t is already once implemented for sampling profiler. Thus, we can >> share / re-implement the same thing for that). >> >>>> If not, then I'd prefer to wait until it's going to be enabled in the >>>> macOS port. >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jsc-dev mailing list >>>> jsc-...@lists.webkit.org >>>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/jsc-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-gtk mailing list >> webkit-gtk@lists.webkit.org >> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk > , > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-gtk mailing list > webkit-gtk@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ webkit-gtk mailing list webkit-gtk@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk
