> AFAIU Zero is based on 32-bit ARM, and WASM requires B3 that is 64-bit only.
performance for the already performant, seems legit :D I didn't know this precious detail, thanks a lot for the info! Never mind my previous email. Best Regards On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > > 01.03.2017, 20:10, "Andrea Giammarchi" <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com>: > > Chiming in, it'd be awesome to be able to test WASM on 2.16 behind a > flag, I'm targeting mostly SBC including Raspberry Pi 0 where WebKitGTK+ > already works like a charm (enabling WebGL and with HW accelerated layers) > but I can't compare performance against WASM and building from scratch > targeting Pi Zero ain't the easiest thing to do. > > AFAIU Zero is based on 32-bit ARM, and WASM requires B3 that is 64-bit > only. > > > > > Thanks for eventual consideration. > > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Yusuke SUZUKI <utatane....@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Saam Barati <sbar...@apple.com> wrote: > >>> On Mar 1, 2017, at 7:46 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@igalia.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 15:44 +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: > >>>> We have recently branched for 2.16 so it's a perfect moment to enable > >>>> it in trunk with very little risk. > >>>> > >>>> Is Apple planning to enable it within the next six months? If so, now > >>>> is indeed the ideal time to enable it for WebKitGTK+. > >>> > >>> What do you mean by enable it? It's been on by default on the Mac port > for a while now and has been in the various STP releases. > >>> > >>> I think it's a good idea to enable it on other ports too. Note that > Keith is currently working on a patch to make loads faster in Wasm. It may > require some OS specific handling to run well on Linux: > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162693 > >> > >> Awesome! I think enabling WASM on Linux after landing Keith's faster > memory access patch (by using SEGV signal handling instead of bound > checking) is good. > >> Once that patch is implemented and landed, we can start implementing > platform-specific part of that (extracting instruction pointer from > mcontext_t and signal handling part should be implemented for Linux). > >> I think that should be easy (since retrieving instruction pointer from > mcontext_t is already once implemented for sampling profiler. Thus, we can > share / re-implement the same thing for that). > >> > >>>> If not, then I'd prefer to wait until it's going to be enabled in the > >>>> macOS port. > >>>> > >>>> Michael > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> jsc-dev mailing list > >>>> jsc-...@lists.webkit.org > >>>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/jsc-dev > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> webkit-gtk mailing list > >> webkit-gtk@lists.webkit.org > >> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk > > , > > > > _______________________________________________ > > webkit-gtk mailing list > > webkit-gtk@lists.webkit.org > > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk > > > -- > Regards, > Konstantin >
_______________________________________________ webkit-gtk mailing list webkit-gtk@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk