On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:23:22PM +0200, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote: > I think the question is, whether our public header files really need > to adopt to Qt style or whether WebKit style is sufficient. > > Personally, I cannot see why we cannot just adopt WebKit style for the > below issues. > > The only thing that we cannot really work around are our function > naming for private methods and for autotest methods. > > Private methods like qt_blah should be deprecated and replaced by > dynamic properties anyway.
All qt_.* methods are ignored by check-webkit-style anyway. <snip> -- Ademar de Souza Reis Jr. OpenBossa Labs - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia (INdT) ^[:wq! _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
