快捷回复给：Konstantin Tokarev, Simon Hausmann, webkit-qt, Benjamin Poulain At 2011-01-17 23:14:35，"Konstantin Tokarev" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >14.01.2011, 21:38, "Benjamin Poulain" <[email protected]>: >> On 01/14/2011 07:30 PM, ext Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> >>>> Long term QtWebKit will depends on QtScript for the bridge. To avoid >>>> inconsistencies and regressions, I think it would be more reasonable to >>>> guard the functions of the bridge with #ifndef QT_NO_SCRIPT. >>> Do you mean it's OK to disable whole class QtInstance? (AFAIU, its main >>> method is getQtInstance, and from your words it should be disabled) >> >> Yep, #ifdef the public methods, and do not compile the classes of the >> bridge. > >I've submitted https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52469 >But Simon does not like this idea. >Or have I misunderstood something? > >-- >Regards, >Konstantin >_______________________________________________ >webkit-qt mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
_______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
