On Thursday, May 10, 2012 09:55:47 AM ext Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After a few emails, let me formulate a concrete proposal:
> > (1) Andrea Diamantini maintains an up-to-date port of WebKit that runs
> >
> > with Qt 4, on gitorious.org.
> >
> > (2) End of May we remove Qt 4 code paths from WebKit trunk.
> >
> > (3) We replace the Qt 4 based bot on build.webkit.org with the Qt 5
> > one
> >
> > (hosted on Amazon, right?)
>
> After some thought, I think we should maintain atleast one stable desktop
> version of QtWebKit in trunk, and I believe Lars already officially stated
> that Qt 5.0 will not be fully ready for the desktop, so I suggest we
> maintain QtWebkit for Qt 4.8 until Qt 5.x is deemed ready for the desktop.
>
> Since we only support Qt 4.8 for WebKit1 where not that much development is
> happening, how much would we gain in dropping that support anyway?
It's a fair question, and I admit I didn't outline that in the proposal. The
maintenance of the Qt 4 port currently costs us
(1) Separate *Qt4.cpp files in a few places (including the much loved
JSC<>QT bindings ;)
(2) A fair chunk of #ifdefs
(3) A bot to maintain (This is a very high cost, especially for Ossy).
I'm proposing the remove the Qt 4 port from trunk because nobody appears to be
interested in taking over that maintenance in trunk. Andrea on the other hand
volunteered to do an out-of-trunk maintenance, which is a great opportunity I
thought.
Simon
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
