On Thursday 10 May 2012 09:25:22 Alexis Menard wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <k...@carewolf.com> wrote:
[snip] > > After some thought, I think we should maintain atleast one stable desktop > > version of QtWebKit in trunk, and I believe Lars already officially stated > > that Qt 5.0 will not be fully ready for the desktop, so I suggest we > > maintain QtWebkit for Qt 4.8 until Qt 5.x is deemed ready for the > > desktop. > > Well he said Qt 5 + QML. > > QWidget is still there rocking as he was. So Qt5 + Desktop is working > fine if you rely on QWidget which is what WK1 is relying on. Stupid question about Qt5 + WK1. Will it be using JSC as javascript engine or it will move to v8 as well? > > Since we only support Qt 4.8 for WebKit1 where not that much development > > is > > happening, how much would we gain in dropping that support anyway? > > Stuff like that could be avoided : > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=140979&action=review > > > `Allan > > _______________________________________________ > > webkit-qt mailing list > > webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org > > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt -- Andrea Diamantini, adjam GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F rekonq project WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org IRC: rekonq@freenode _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
