11.01.2016, 14:33, "Vitaly Slobodin" <[email protected]>: > Hello, > > First of all, I want to say thank you for reviving QtWebkit. We (the > PhantomJS team) are really depend on it.
Thanks! Great to know there are more people interested in QtWebKit. > We tried to use QtWebEngine but, unfortunately, it doesn't satisfy our > requirements. > So, I'm doing exact the same job as you do. Thta's sad to see work being duplicated. You should have been notified others on the list. Nevertheless, I hope we will be able to join our work. > > The main difference that I use the old QMake build system. So far, I have a > partially working build. It compiles successfully, but it doesn't work > properly. > I really looking look forward to help you as much as I can do (for example, I > can help you with Windows port). > Upstream version of Webkit has changed too much, so the old QMake-based build > system is not stable. I think CMake is much better option. Like I wrote before, upstream is converging around use of CMake as *the* build system of WebKit, so it's not reasonable to resist. So I decided to go straight to CMake, despite some bias that I have against it. I've found that WebKit team has made a great job at making their CMake build system suitable for satisfying requirements of different port. Let's use it. > > Thanks! I think it's premature to thank me for anything yet, I've done only a tiny bit of work for this moment. BTW, I and Julien have contributed a number of patches to WebKit trunk with a goal to fix MIPS backend. Any interested parties are welcome to join us! > > With regards, > Vitaly. -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
