> Thta's sad to see work being duplicated. You should have been notified others > on the list. Nevertheless, I hope we will be able to join our work. Well, I did it really quickly, so I know that there're some problems. I just wanted to check if it's possible.
> Like I wrote before, upstream is converging around use of CMake as *the* > build system of WebKit, so it's not reasonable to resist. So I decided to go > straight to CMake, despite some bias that I have against it. Using CMake makes the whole job much easier. We don't need to convert CMake macros for auto-generated files. In other words, with CMake we don't need to do redundant work. > I think it's premature to thank me for anything yet, I've done only a tiny > bit of work for this moment. I'll definitely help you as much as I can! With regards, Vitaly. > On 11 Jan 2016, at 14:48, Konstantin Tokarev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 11.01.2016, 14:33, "Vitaly Slobodin" <[email protected]>: >> Hello, >> >> First of all, I want to say thank you for reviving QtWebkit. We (the >> PhantomJS team) are really depend on it. > > Thanks! Great to know there are more people interested in QtWebKit. > >> We tried to use QtWebEngine but, unfortunately, it doesn't satisfy our >> requirements. >> So, I'm doing exact the same job as you do. > > Thta's sad to see work being duplicated. You should have been notified others > on the list. Nevertheless, I hope we will be able to join our work. > >> >> The main difference that I use the old QMake build system. So far, I have a >> partially working build. It compiles successfully, but it doesn't work >> properly. >> I really looking look forward to help you as much as I can do (for example, >> I can help you with Windows port). >> Upstream version of Webkit has changed too much, so the old QMake-based >> build system is not stable. I think CMake is much better option. > > Like I wrote before, upstream is converging around use of CMake as *the* > build system of WebKit, so it's not reasonable to resist. So I decided to go > straight to CMake, despite some bias that I have against it. > > I've found that WebKit team has made a great job at making their CMake build > system suitable for satisfying requirements of different port. Let's use it. > >> >> Thanks! > > I think it's premature to thank me for anything yet, I've done only a tiny > bit of work for this moment. > > > BTW, I and Julien have contributed a number of patches to WebKit trunk with a > goal to fix MIPS backend. Any interested parties are welcome to join us! > > >> >> With regards, >> Vitaly. > > > > -- > Regards, > Konstantin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
