On Feb 16, 11:46 pm, Vyacheslav Akhmechet <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Also, an append method combination fixes the ordering, which in my case > > is a no-no. > > Ok. I think this is easy to fix, though. How would you solve this in general? You're probably thinking of an :AROUND method that refers to another protocol to figure out the correct final ordering? It seems complicated to me, but I still would like to keep the APPEND mc idea, so let's discuss it. Both you and Stephen (in a slightly different but essentially similar way) have proposed this, and it looks like a good thing at first sight. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
