Vyacheslav Akhmechet <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Jan Rychter <[email protected]> wrote: >> The above interface looks almost exactly like what I implemented, just >> change the names. > Err, on a second look, I guess you're right :) > > After sleeping on it for a few days, my only problem is the whole type > thing. It just doesn't seem to fit and is pretty confusing at the > beginning. If we passed an object instance instead of an arbitrary > type argument, I think it would be a much more intuitive solution > (small matter, I know).
I agree the naming sucks. I'm not happy about it myself. I can't even remember the order of arguments to set-children-of-type sometimes. But object instances are problematic -- because then you'd need to key by class name or a hash of class instance, and I have widgets that store children of two different kinds. Perhaps set-children-of-kind sounds better? > I think the rest of the navigation rewrite is a great design - it > really smoothes out some rough corners. Thanks, I'm glad you like it. --J. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
