On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Jan Rychter <[email protected]> wrote: > Could you provide a short example of what you consider to be "parent > object instances"? Err, sorry, I was thinking something incredibly stupid. I apologize for wasting your time.
I still don't like set-children-of-type (it's not really about the name, just the way the whole thing is rubs me the wrong way), but I can't come up with a reasonable improvment. It's not *too* bad though, there are definitely less pleasant parts of weblocks than this :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
