On Apr 15, 3:33 pm, Chris Hallwright <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've been focussing on prevalence only - I want to get that right > before going back to clsql. So this post is all from working with > prevalence. It would be good to know whether you see the same effects > when you run weblocks-demo i.e. do you get > ...the address slots displaying OK? > ...title case in the menu for Employees and Companies? I just tested it, with these results: * casing is always correct here both with latest tip and the older 58878da3ae72 * address data is missing indeed (never noticed it before) with latest but shows up in 58878d. Stephen, might your changes to the view field inheritance system (or my changes that you've been overriding) be responsible for that? > I'm scratching for clues. One thing that I've noticed is that when I > compile weblocks I get a bunch of warnings of special variables that > are undefined - the SBCL compilation summary lists them as: > ; WEBLOCKS:*AUTHENTICATION-KEY* WEBLOCKS::*CURRENT-WEBAPP* > WEBLOCKS:*DEFAULT-LOGIN-TITLE* WEBLOCKS::*MAINTAIN-LAST-SESSION* > WEBLOCKS:*MAX-RAW-INPUT-LENGTH* > ; compilation unit finished > ; caught 10 WARNING conditions > > Do you think this could have a bearing? No, that's unlikely. But I guess you didn't delete all FASLs before trying the older version... Leslie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
