"Leslie P. Polzer" <sky-A/[email protected]> writes: > Looking at get-object-view-fields.direct-shadow-proper-mixin > -- the test case seems a bit contrived. What's the use case > for specifying a mixin directly followed by an inline of the > same name?
Imagine the mixin appearing in the inherited view instead. >> while also allowing mixin-parameterization of inherited true-inlines? > > What do you mean by mixin-parameterization? It's what the person-*-view does with the `address' view field; it tries to override an inherited true-inline with a mixin-view-field. To imbue a view field with mixininess. -- Sorry but you say Nibiru is a Hoax? Doesnt Exist? So maybe The Sumerian people doesnt exist also! --Anonymous by way of SkI --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
