"Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]> writes: > Jan Rychter wrote: > >>> Won't this mean that nothing will get indexed, as googlebot won't be >>> able to establish a session (which requires a redirect through a "?" >>> link)? >> >> So, while we're pondering this problem, why does weblocks require a >> redirect when opening a session? > > No clue. Send a patch to remove it if you like.
I will, because this makes all weblocks sites invisible to Google. I'm trying to understand the rationale, though -- the description in request-handler.lisp seems to indicate this was done in order to support clients without cookie support. Is supporting browsers without cookies something we care about? --J. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
