On May 29, 7:18 pm, Jan Rychter <[email protected]> wrote: > > No clue. Send a patch to remove it if you like. > > I will, because this makes all weblocks sites invisible to Google.
You could probably write a sitemap. > I'm trying to understand the rationale, though -- the description in > request-handler.lisp seems to indicate this was done in order to support > clients without cookie support. > > Is supporting browsers without cookies something we care about? Yes, but I don't understand why we would need the redirect in that place for this. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
