John Fremlin wrote:
> Curious to know what is better? (I am strangely enough a bit of a > trivial-backtrace proponent as I wrote my own trivial-backtrace before > finding out that Gary already had written it, and then included my code > in his version.) TRIVIAL-BACKTRACE represents the lowest common denominator. In particular it just gives you a fixed string representation of a backtrace with all semantics stripped away. So on SBCL we pick apart the elements of the trace and use that information to apply custom formatting. We could do that on other implementations as well of course, the code just isn't there. >> We can read-conditionalize this dep in the ASD. Can you provide >> a patch for that? > > Is this it? ;-) Yup, thanks. You don't happen to have a fork of Weblocks where I could just pull changesets from you? Leslie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
