"Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]> writes: [...] > So on SBCL we pick apart the elements of the trace and use > that information to apply custom formatting.
Sorry, I thought backtraces were totally borked on SBCL and didn't realise this was your plan. Now looking at the code I see why. The printing will not work presence of objects that are circular (and so cannot be printed in a finite time depending on the *print-...* settings). Maybe you should leave it to trivial-backtrace :-) > We could do that on other implementations as well of course, > the code just isn't there. > > >>> We can read-conditionalize this dep in the ASD. Can you provide >>> a patch for that? >> >> Is this it? ;-) > > Yup, thanks. > > You don't happen to have a fork of Weblocks where I could just pull > changesets from you? Not yet -- maybe I will have time to sort one out in the next couple of weeks as the client has signed on the AJAXy goodness (and back button fail) . . . [...] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
