"Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]> writes: > On Aug 28, 2:57 am, Eric <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Raymond, that did the trick, though I hope that won't cause >> further problems in the future! Let me know if something should still >> be said to the CCL folks. > > Yes, definitely. There's some bug in their compiler.
I ran across this at work but was doing something else so didn't dive in. The problem I think is that cl-cont doesn't understand ccl's compiler-let. Another example where macroexpand-dammit should step in :-) Perhaps the most practical solution is to make assert not be call/cc transformed. [...] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
