On Aug 29, 4:02 am, John Fremlin <[email protected]> wrote: > The problem I think is that cl-cont doesn't understand ccl's > compiler-let.
You're probably right, but CCL's compiler wants to handle that more gracefully I bet. > Another example where macroexpand-dammit should step in > :-) Since you mention it, where have we left off discussing this? > Perhaps the most practical solution is to make assert not be call/cc > transformed. Got patch? :) Leslie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
