On Aug 28, 10:24 pm, timor <[email protected]> wrote: > The second version does not, what am i missing? Is there a break in > the continuation passing chain somewhere? Do function widgets behave > in a special way?
First a hint: don't rely on the return value of DO-PAGE. The DO functions are not really supposed to return a sensible value. So I recommend that you use them in a procedural context. Without further analysis I can't tell you why one version works and the other does not. But there are questions that need to be asked: what actually is the continuation that is invoked by (answer rw)? How is it supposed to handle the result passed to ANSWER? Leslie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
