timor wrote:
>> I'm not sure what you mean here. > I meant relying on the return value, for the given problem. Well, the functions could be modified to return something useful (i.e. some widget). Perhaps some or all of them already do that; in this case some tests would need to be added to ensure this behavior, and documentation. But would you really want to use a return value? The DO- prefix already strongly suggests that work is mainly being done with side-effects. >> You don't need continuations at all to implement the behavior above, >> and no flash widget either -- which is fortunate because you will have >> a hard time diving in with continuation tech right away. > which was my primary goal to understand and make use of by diving into > weblocks, though. I think I'd rather invest some hard time diving into > the continuation tech, but i don't really know where to start, other > than reading source code documentation. I see, in this case my advice wasn't helpful at all of course. > I used the flash widget merely as means to display something, > basically as not-so-complex interaction. I didn't know it was that > complicated under the hood. How about this: you remove the flash stuff, use DO-PAGE in a procedural fashion (independent from the discussion above, just for solving this problem), do some more tests with DO-WIDGET directly and then report back here. Try to narrow down the case more too. We will solve your problem in any case, but I need some more work from you since I don't have much time right now... Leslie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
