Oh, I see that this is fixed in weblocks-dev. I had been using http://bitbucket.org/skypher/weblocks-stable.
What weblocks is the right weblocks to use? Zach On Sep 14, 3:41 pm, Zach Beane <[email protected]> wrote: > The weblocks package uses both the CL package and the C2MOP package. > To avoid the conflicts, it then shadows some of the CL symbols. > However, this causes a problem on Closer-MOP/ClozureCL, because it has > an additional export of C2MOP:STANDARD-METHOD not seen on other > implementations. > > > Error: Using #<Package "COMMON-LISP"> in #<Package "BUGHUNT"> > > would cause name conflicts with symbols inherited by that package: > > CLOSER-MOP:STANDARD-METHOD STANDARD-METHOD > > My impression is that closer-mop's CLOSER-COMMON-LISP package is meant > to be used instead of using both CL and C2MOP, but I think the problem > could also be eliminated by shadowing STANDARD-METHOD, too, in the > defpackage form. > > Zach -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
