On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Jean Pierre Malrieu wrote:

I am not using it, so my question is just for curiosity.
I thought that dynamic D2JC apps were not using nib files, and that swing interfaces where created out of xml descriptions, or by programmatically creating controllers. Is there a technical reason for deprecating D2JC, or is it that without the possibility of mixing with nib-based interfaces, D2JC looses so much interest that maintaining it becomes more costly than useful? If the reason for deprecating D2JC is not technical, I find it a little bit sad that all this amount of code (and there seems to be quite a lot code for controllers, etc.) just disappears. I understand that Apple does not want to maintain a tool that is not widely used, and that will be even less used now that the possiblity of mixing dynamic and nib based interface is gone. But If xml-based D2JC can still be used, maybe the relevant parts of the code could be made public? Of course, if there is a purely technical reason for deprecating D2JC (like the reason for deprecating WOBuilder), please forget my last question.

Because while D2JC sounds good in theory, in practice D2JC applications are a nightmare to maintain. You end up factoring your code 3 days:

   .common
   .server
   .client

  On top of whatever splitting EOGenerator does for you.

It's practically a given that you'll be in the wrong "Person.java" when you go to do anything.

They're a royal bitch to debug, because you have the client talking to the server talking to the client.

So I suspect Java Client just got given up as a bad idea. Just my $0.02 at having to maintain a Java Client app, everyone in the company hates it, and we decided to just drop it in the trash even before Apple deprecated the whole idea.

 Pierce

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to