Hi Galen, I think it is not like WOLips vs Xcode where the latter was deprecated and everybody must use the former. In this case, Maven is an alternative to Ant. In fact, you can use both if you want (like Wonder does). Anyway, a mechanism [1][2] to develop WO projects with Maven is not recent. They exist for more than a year.
You will see people telling that there is no reason to use Maven to build a WebObjects project (like Chuck) and people that cannot imagine your development lifecycle without Maven (like me). The funny part is that both group of people are probably right. :) You have to identify which tool fits best to your needs. [1] http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/WOProject-Maven2 [2] http://wocreator.sourceforge.net/ Cheers, Henrique PS.: Everything I have been writing here is based on my observation of the discussions and my own experience with WO and Maven. I haven't gone neither to WOWODC nor WWDC. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Galen Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, is Maven becoming the new standard for building WebObjects instead of > Ant? From a WebObjects point of view, what advantages does Maven have over > Ant? > > -- > Galen Rhodes > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.photoyoda.com > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/hprange%40gmail.com > > This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
