"Even Apple have dodgy bits of PHP bolted on to their web site.http://is.gd/1i8tH
Still, got to be better than WebObjects, right?"
I find that kind of comments at least 3 times per week :-/
Most of the people on twitter don't even know what apps are and aren't
WebObjects (nor what WebObjects even IS, for that matter) ... Go do a
search -- they bitch about the iPhone developer forum, for instance,
which is JSP/Servlet.
<IMO>What it comes down to is that software is hard, and most apps
suck, regardless of the framework you use. Making an app scale in WO
is hard. Making an app scale in Rails is hard. WO/EOF have some great
concepts, but it's not like it's immune from scaling problems, the
problems are just different. I think Rails probably lets you get a
simple-to-medium app up more easy, WO lets you get a medium-to-big app
up more easily, and both of them have problems > "big," just in
different ways. The question is whether we can make the WO experience
for "simple-to-medium" competitive, which it just isn't right now (a
combination of lots of factors, all solvable).</IMO>
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
