I think most of them blame WO for everything just because of either
the URLs (I saw a couple of stupid comments about how "bad", in
their opinion, WO URLs are) or because the Apple Online Store is
down when they release new or updated stuff... But it's funny to
see RoR/PHP people blame WO for scabality but Twitter generate
timeouts or "overlead" messages everyday and they just have to deal
with 140 chars message :-) Imagine if they had to deal with the
same size of content as iTunes...
What makes you think they don't? They most probably got more users,
more concurrent requests and more shared content (between users).
Which takes them to a range of problems that I'm not sure are fun to
do with WO. WO is really cool with creating really complex
interactioning, user-owns-data, lotsa-editing type apps. For a lot
of other things, it probably creates at least as much problems than
it solves...
Yep, I agree ... Have fun writing Twitter in WO. People talk trash
about Twitter, but scaling anything to that many people is hard as
hell. It doesn't matter if it's in WO or Perl, your awesome design is
out the window with that many people hitting you. Not to mention, most
of the cool stuff that has gone into Wonder from me in the past 2 or 3
years is a ripoff of frameworks from Rails. Framework battles is a
waste of time. I'd rather figure out what's good in each of them and
steal liberally.
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
