On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 8, 2009, at 5:46 AM, William Hatch wrote:
On Jul 8, 2009, at 7:04 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
Yeah, this is really good news. Now that WO releases won't be tied
to OS X and Xcode releases, I'm betting we'll see far more
frequent releases of updates to the frameworks.
seriously? I remember the exact inverse statements being made when,
only four-ish years ago, they tied WO's release schedule back into
the main development tools. I think it's good news, but hopefully
it means that they'll stop developing their unnecessary deployment
that virtually nobody uses
??? I'd guest that the majority of WO projects are deployed like
this. Servlet deployment is a distant second.
Chuck
I'm glad someone else said it. I thought perhaps I was just out of
touch!
-- Mark
and focus on the frameworks instead. I hate the thought of one more
minute going into maintaining wotaskd, monitor and everything else
that goes along with WebObjects as a stand alone application
server. They should have done it long ago, and in all honesty, we
should have been willing to let that go a long time ago, if it
would have helped with resources inside apple devoted to developing
WO.
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
