At least someone asked! :-)
Nothing against ERXEC, just too many existing frameworks and code
bases that rely on my EC subclass and no time to Wonderize them. It
is pretty high on my list of "things to do before I die" though.
Chuck
On Nov 18, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Why not?
Cheers, Anjo
Am 19.11.2009 um 04:06 schrieb Chuck Hill:
You might be better off not having an ERXEC subclass if you can
avoid it (even if Chuck uses one ;-) )
Chuck does not use ERXEC at all...
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net
This email sent to [email protected]
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
