Thought so :) Cheers, Anjo
Am 19.11.2009 um 04:43 schrieb Chuck Hill: > At least someone asked! :-) > > Nothing against ERXEC, just too many existing frameworks and code bases that > rely on my EC subclass and no time to Wonderize them. It is pretty high on > my list of "things to do before I die" though. > > > Chuck > > > On Nov 18, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Anjo Krank wrote: > >> Why not? >> >> Cheers, Anjo >> >> >> >> Am 19.11.2009 um 04:06 schrieb Chuck Hill: >> >>>> You might be better off not having an ERXEC subclass if you can avoid it >>>> (even if Chuck uses one ;-) ) >>> >>> Chuck does not use ERXEC at all... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net >> >> This email sent to [email protected] > > -- > Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development > > Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall > knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. > http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
