On 10/02/2010, at 12:10 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: > > Le 2010-02-09 à 20:48, Lachlan Deck a écrit : > >> All interesting speculation - but why does this need mentioning on >> wocommunity at all? >> >> As was mentioned in the recent thread, this kind of stuff is all too >> defensive / negative. WOCommunity should be sprouting the positives... what >> do you get with WO? > > I agree that we need more positive stuff but I read all tweets that mentions > WebObjects in it and the majority is negative about WO. So the "Why > WebObjects" page should be more positive, but we still need, IMHO, a facts > page for things like this.
Perhaps this would be better suited to a "WebObjects Myths" section of the website. -- Seeya...Q Quinton Dolan - [email protected] Gold Coast, QLD, Australia (GMT+10) _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
