Le 2010-02-09 à 21:54, Q a écrit : > > On 10/02/2010, at 12:10 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: > >> >> Le 2010-02-09 à 20:48, Lachlan Deck a écrit : >> >>> All interesting speculation - but why does this need mentioning on >>> wocommunity at all? >>> >>> As was mentioned in the recent thread, this kind of stuff is all too >>> defensive / negative. WOCommunity should be sprouting the positives... what >>> do you get with WO? >> >> I agree that we need more positive stuff but I read all tweets that mentions >> WebObjects in it and the majority is negative about WO. So the "Why >> WebObjects" page should be more positive, but we still need, IMHO, a facts >> page for things like this. > > Perhaps this would be better suited to a "WebObjects Myths" section of the > website.
Hey, good idea! And we can bury the link somewhere (eg, not as a top-level menu item) so that we only use it when needed and for Googlebot. _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
