On Sep 10, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Michael DeMan wrote: > Well > > I can not say for sure, but it is incredibly difficult to get folks who have > expertise in WebObjects anywhere, at low cost.
Why would you want them at low cost? > It also has been a dying technology since NeXT got Apple back. I disagree. Stable, yes. Dying, no. > I am not sure why it was never just open sourced, other than it must be that > somebody somewhere at ex-NeXT or Apple has an unreasonable ego. It's not about anyone's ego. Alan > > Also, there is no reason for a large company that has staffing requirements, > to not use technologies that have broader exposure in advance to incoming > technology professionals > > > > On Sep 9, 2010, at 11:54 PM, Mertz Stéphan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The new 'the Sales and Trend reporting module' of iTunes Connect is develop >> with JSF instead of WebObjects. >> Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools? >> >> Does someone know what is powering the new Ping social network ? >> >> Regards, >> >> Stéphan _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40deman.com >> >> This email sent to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/award%40apple.com > > This email sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
