On 11/03/2011, at 8:21 PM, Orphee Sandjo wrote: >> On 11/03/2011, at 2:37 PM, Joe Little wrote: >> >>> Well, I grok groovy more than scala, but that isn't saying much. I >>> just see Grails as getting everything right about Java (for the most >>> part) >> >> nothing wrong with groovy or Grails. For a statically typed, OO & functional >> lang I'm liking scala. But whatever gets the job done and keeps things >> interesting... :) >> >>> and picking what was right about Rails. Liftweb seems to make my >>> brain hurt, >> >> admittedly the docs for lift have (for an intro) too much info... it needs >> some more quickstart guides. But it is a very cool and powerful framework. >> The templates are very nicely done: there's no logic in the display code, >> etc. Very active community. > > I don't know which is worse : logic in display code or display code in logic
:) Yep, I was initially horrified by that... but even though it allows display code in your code (as scala understands xml natively) you can just point it to a snippet template. with regards, - Lachlan Deck _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
