On 2011-04-29, at 12:05 AM, Joe Little wrote: > Just seeing if this can be answered > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Joe Little <[email protected]> >> Date: April 27, 2011 1:18:36 PM PDT >> To: Ramsey Gurley <[email protected]> >> Cc: WebObjects-Dev Mailing List List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: D2W display rules for relationships >> >> Thanks. One thing I noticed is that from Inspect pages, if I add an >> action like the below, instead of going to the new InspectAffiliate >> page, I get the ajax quick progress effect and no new page. The >> generated page has javascript:void(0) when I hover over the inspect. >> Does a rule need to exist to enable actions from Embedded >> pageConfigurations?
If you are using ERM* action buttons in an embedded list page (and not an embedded edit relationship page) then you need to disable inline editing and ajax behaviours. If I get a chance I'll look up the keys later today (if I can extricate myself from under the rocks that are currently covering me). >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Ramsey Gurley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> If you're using an embedded list, you can add actions like: >>> >>> 100: pageConfiguration = 'ListEmbeddedAffiliate' => actions = >>> {left=("inspectAction");right=();} >>> >>> Ramsey >>> >>> On Apr 26, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Joe Little wrote: >>> >>>> Here's another one. If I have an edit page for an entity, my >>>> relationships should up with Edit/Inspect buttons. If, however, I >>>> inspect an entity, I get neither of those buttons and thus can't >>>> inspect (or get full details like I want) for the relationship. There >>>> is some default rule that likely causes this, but I'm not smart enough >>>> obviously to figure it out. In the current case, I have a >>>> ERMODListPage coming from a ListEmbeddedAffiliate that has no buttons, >>>> but the inspect/edit buttons come with a ERMODEditRelationshipPage >>>> from the EditRelationshipEmbeddedAffiliate. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Joe Little <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> worked like a charm.. on to my other problematically displayed fields.. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:11 PM, David LeBer >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2011-04-26, at 5:56 PM, Joe Little wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Lets focus on *Note pages and their display of Projects (one to one).. >>>>>>> That answer is ERD2WDisplayToOne or ERMDEditRelationship >>>>>> >>>>>> ERD2WDisplayToOne is going to use keyWhenRelationship. >>>>>> >>>>>> ERMEditRelationship embeds an ERMODEditRelationshipPage so it will get >>>>>> it's on copy of the d2wContext and it's own pageConfiguration. So use a >>>>>> rule something like: >>>>>> >>>>>> pageConfiguration = 'EditRelationshipEmbeddedProject' => >>>>>> displayPropertyKeys = ("name") [Assignment] >>>>>> >>>>>> If you need to qualify further (i.e: change the displayPropertyKeys >>>>>> depending on what the parent object is) you can add an 'and' to >>>>>> something like: parentPageConfiguration = 'EditNote' >>>>>> >>>>>> Note: Typed directly into mail, YMMV, it's the end of the day, don't >>>>>> quote me, look... bunnies! >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:41 PM, David LeBer >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2011-04-26, at 5:34 PM, Joe Little wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm trying to get any Projects that have Notes to display just the >>>>>>>>> noteText, and likewise, all Notes to display just the project Name for >>>>>>>>> their relationships, but its always shows all the fields. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (pageConfiguration like '*Project' and propertyKey = 'notes') => >>>>>>>>> displayPropertyKeys = ("noteText") >>>>>>>>> (pageConfiguration like '*Note' and propreryKey = 'project) => >>>>>>>>> displayPropertyKeys = ("name") >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Don't seem to have any affect. Any clue to what I'm doing wrong? I >>>>>>>>> used the D2W inspector, and those should be the rules for what I have. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What component is being used to display the relationship to Notes for >>>>>>>> a Project, and what component is displaying the Project for a Note? >>>>>> >>>>>> ;david >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> David LeBer >>>>>> Codeferous Software >>>>>> 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing' >>>>>> site: http://codeferous.com >>>>>> blog: http://davidleber.net >>>>>> profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber >>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld >>>>>> -- >>>>>> WOWODC 2011 : July 1-2-3, Montreal. http://wowodc.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40smarthealth.com >>>> >>>> This email sent to [email protected] >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/dleber_wodev%40codeferous.com > > This email sent to [email protected] ;david -- David LeBer Codeferous Software 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing' site: http://codeferous.com blog: http://davidleber.net profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld -- WOWODC 2011 : July 1-2-3, Montreal. http://wowodc.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
