I remember Nibble! Yes, Pascal, you are pretty young for the community at 35!
I'm sorry I couldn't make WOWODC this year - lets start planning the next one so I can plan my family vacation around it :) On Jul 6, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Ken Anderson wrote: > It's honestly pretty simple. > > Apple never makes statements about future products, or their plan for > existing products. If you're holding your breath for that to happen, good > luck! > > The community continues to maintain / upgrade WO in a way that is far better > than a corporation holding the reins. Even for a currently sold commercial > product, what guarantee is there that it will be updated? Or Open Source > projects that have little to no support when the champion has left it? > > To me, just the fact that WebObjects has been around since 1996 (15 years!) > means that it has more legs than any other tool I can think of. > > YMMV > > Ken > > On Jul 6, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Karl wrote: > >> I don’t think that there is an issue about it disappearing. The license >> allows us to use what we have now indefinitely. >> >> The issue is about moving forwards and modernizing... >> >> Karl >> >> On Jul 6, 2011, at 7:45 PM, Robert B. Hanviriyapunt wrote: >> >>> How about the continued availability of WO. People can SAY that Apple >>> relies heavily on WO and thus it won't go away, but again it just feels >>> more secure knowing that it is officially true, and that WO will always be >>> kept out there so that I can put away my doubts that it will suddenly >>> disappear. I'd just feel safer while we're all building on this platform >>> that it won't be pulled from under us. >>> >>> On Jul 6, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Jesse Tayler wrote: >>> >>>> there has been official word-- you just gotta go back ten years and ask >>>> ernie prabhakar or something. >>>> >>>> seriously, the official word is that WO is and shall remain WO and will >>>> never be open sourced or whatever. >>>> >>>> I opine as well, but that's the way it is and shall be. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 6, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Robert B. Hanviriyapunt wrote: >>>> >>>>> Who, if anyone, represents Apple on this mailing list? When it comes to >>>>> questions of open-sourcing WO or the availability of WO, the answer >>>>> should be posted by an Apple official rep. in this mailing list. Anyone >>>>> can opine, but I think the group benefits greatly when an official word >>>>> is heard -- second best to that is an "insider", even if not officially >>>>> charged by Apple to represent in the list. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts anyone? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kgretton%40mac.com >>> >>> This email sent to [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kenlists%40anderhome.com >> >> This email sent to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kenlists%40anderhome.com > > This email sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
