On 2011-09-27, at 8:57 AM, Pascal Robert wrote: > So that it's bookmarkable and that search engine robots can index it?
And so it's humanly readable and guessable. D > >> Why does Apple want to obscure their use of WebObjects with re-written URLs? >> >> richard palmer >> >> On Sep 23, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: >> >>> Cookies or, if you know you are using only HTML5 browsers, maybe local >>> database storage. And don't assume there is no WO app based on the URL >>> alone. Re-written URLs can hide a lot. >>> -- David LeBer Codeferous Software 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing' site: http://codeferous.com blog: http://davidleber.net profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld -- Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group: http://tacow.org _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
