Le 2011-09-27 à 09:05, David LeBer a écrit : > > On 2011-09-27, at 8:57 AM, Pascal Robert wrote: > >> So that it's bookmarkable and that search engine robots can index it? > > And so it's humanly readable and guessable.
And shorter to send over on Twitter. > D > >> >>> Why does Apple want to obscure their use of WebObjects with re-written URLs? >>> >>> richard palmer >>> >>> On Sep 23, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: >>> >>>> Cookies or, if you know you are using only HTML5 browsers, maybe local >>>> database storage. And don't assume there is no WO app based on the URL >>>> alone. Re-written URLs can hide a lot. >>>> > > > -- > David LeBer > Codeferous Software > 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing' > site: http://codeferous.com > blog: http://davidleber.net > profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber > twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld > -- > Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group: > http://tacow.org > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca > > This email sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
