Hi Pascal, I think everyone should give one more pass at MooTools. I know that jQuery is very popular right now but MooTools is designed from an object oriented perspective. So for people like us, who are already using Java, MooTools just feels more natural. If you look at the MooTools documentation (http://mootools.net/docs/core) it shows you how to easily create classes, use inheritance, implement composition, extend with categories et al... Where as jQuery is kind of like a giant collection of scripts that is very useful for people who are more familiar with that style of programming.
Here is a very good article (granted biased) article that explains the difference between the two: http://jqueryvsmootools.com/ My two cents, Johnny Miller Kahalawai Media Corp. www.kahalawai.com On Feb 8, 2012, at 8:06 AM, Pascal Robert wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Looking at the comments and results from the survey, it look like the biggest > priority for 2012 is to have a jQuery framework for WO (for stateful apps, I > think the jQuery framework from Ravi Mendis is stateless only). > > So, I have to ask: who can work on a jQuery framework? I'm asking because I > need to know if we can finance this task. Of if you already have a jQuery > framework that you made, can you share it with the community? We can even > "buy it" if we need to. > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jlmiller%40kahalawai.com > > This email sent to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
