+1 On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: > The sun set on WO a long time ago (well, assuming you think that it ever > really shined on WO). For new projects, WebObjects and Wonder is still my > choice until I find something _better_ not just newer. I am not moving to > something newer and worse because WO is old (though I might move to something > newer and worse if using WO is an impediment to getting new work). When I > find something better, I am gone. I've been looking since 1999 or so... I > look on WebObjects more as a completed library, not an EOL product with no > future. Wonder is the source of new features. Granted, that means no bug > fixes that can't be done in Wonder, but what software do you use that does > NOT have bugs? > > > Chuck >
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
