Am 07.02.2013 20:02 schrieb "Pascal Robert" <prob...@macti.ca>:
>
>
> Le 2013-02-07 à 13:50, Ramsey Gurley <rgur...@smarthealth.com> a écrit :
>
> >
> > On Feb 7, 2013, at 5:59 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> >
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> Based on the feedback we have so far in the surveys (if you haven't
answered the 2013 surveys, please do it in the next 7 days), we established
a list of goals for 2013:
> >>
> >> - We need a jQuery framework. According to the surveys, members of the
community use jQuery almost as much as the Ajax framework from Wonder. In
fact, I'm wondering how you use it now, in Direct Actions? Just for
effects? If you already have a jQuery framework that you would like to give
to the community, we can work it out.
> >
> >
> > We have a couple of these already. What's missing?
>
> That's the good question. Lot of people using jQuery, but I don't see any
framework beside ERJQueryMobile.
>
> >
> >> - Better integration between WO and iOS (and Android). ERSync is a
start, and I was thinking maybe we could make a tool that reads a CoreData
model, convert it to a EOModel and automatically build REST services for
the model.
> >
> >
> > I read this as Java Client for mobile.
>
> I don't think you like this idea :-P
>
> >
> >
> >> - A "Project Wonder Cookbook". That book would contains, two pages
max, solutions to common problems and questions about Project Wonder.
> >
> >
> > I often observe that the biggest problem WO devs have isn't solving a
problem with WO/Wonder. Instead, I see is WO devs reinventing wheels.
Writing solutions for problems already covered by WO/Wonder.
> >
> > The frameworks are so big, people just don't realize what's in there
and come up with one off solutions that aren't as robust in the end.
> >
> > Maybe we should have some WOCommunity highlights or something. A
monthly "Hey, check out this {framework | component | class}. Did you know
...?" sort of thing. Validation is one of these things. WO offers
validation. Wonder improves it greatly. Everyone seems to make up their own
anyway.
>
> +100.
>
> >
> >> - Getting more people to understand and work on WOLips.
> >
> >
> > That'll be tough. Q is our lifeline right now. Without him, I don't
think anyone would have updated WOLips for 4.2.
> >
> >
> >> - A easy-to-install development environment, that would install not
only WOLips and Eclipse, but also the core WO frameworks and Project Wonder.
> >
> >
> > I've given up on this happening. There's too much to do for an
installer and its painful work without any direct benefit for the author
who would need to provide ongoing maintenance and support.  It would need
to install:
> >
> > Eclipse
> > WOLips
> > eGit/git
> > jadclipse
> > WebObjects
> > clone and import Wonder
> > Set up the wolips.properties
> > Apache
> > mod_webobjects
> >
> > And lots of these pieces update independently of the others. The
getting started guide on the wiki is pretty good. It just needs to include
the apache setup.  I had a guy showing interest in WO here at work and he
gave up at Apache. I'm hoping he will get a second wind.
>
> Well, I guess less people bugs you about development tools and deployment
than me :-) Yes, I do have less questions about development tools once the
new wiki page was up, but it's still a pain for some people. But I must say
that the #1 problem is: the incremental builder vs Ant.
>
> I still think that we need that WOLips ships as a Eclipse RCP app, just
like most other IDEs based on Eclipse.
>
> >> - A easy to use deployment service. Having helped many people with
deployment issues, it looks like deployment is still an issue.
> >
> >
> > The linux stuff you are working on sounds promising. I haven't had a
chance to try them out yet, but it would be nice to be able to stay up to
date on java monitor and wotaskd with a package manager.
>
> +1. And the OS X development package should be a .pkg so that it can be
integrated in a workflow like ARD or other tools.
>
Are people out there developing on Debian/Ubuntu?

> >> - Redesign of wocommunity.org.
> >
> >
> > I think wocommunity.org does the job just fine as is. What are you
wanting to redesign?
>
> It's so 2008. I see lots of comments on Twitter about how WO is outdated,
etc., and I don't think it helps that our site looks old too.
>
> >
> >> - Looking at how we can replace parts of WO with open source parts.
The Cayenne training day at WOWODC 2013 is the first step toward that goal.
> >
> >
> > Keeping my comments to myself :-)
> >
> >
> >> How are we going to finance this? We will change how the membership
works. We will have the following options:
> >>
> >> - $50 for regular membership. This $50 will be for paying recurrent
charges, like the hosting fees for wocommunity.org, and to pay for deposits
related to WOWODC. You still get early access to WOWODC recordings.
> >>
> >> - $300 for Bronze Sponsorship. You get membership + your company logo
on wocommunity.org for 6 months (on rotation with other sponsors).
> >>
> >> - $750 for Silver Sponsorship. You get membership + your company logo
on wocommunity.org for 12 months (on rotation with other sponsors) and your
logo on the WOWODC site.
> >>
> >> - $1500 for Gold Sponsorship. You get membership + your company logo
on wocommunity.org for 12 months (no rotation) and your logo on the WOWODC
site. You also get one WOWODC 2013 ticket.
> >
> >
> > A nice flyer or something I could hand to/forward to my boss would be
good here. We are suffering a shortage of WO devs currently, so maybe pitch
it as a way to get more exposure with developers might help. As someone
else mentioned, it would be even better if it were tax deductible and
mentioned that specifically.
>
> About the lack of WO devs, we need to pass the word that:
>
> 1) WO is not so outdated, especially with Wonder
> 2) Need current documentation and tutorials
> 3) Need a easy-to-deploy solution
Distribution packages would be nice if JavaXML wouldn't be embedded ...
> 4) Need to get iOS devs to use Wonder
>
> >
> >>
> >> For bigger tasks, like the jQuery framework and the Project Wonder
Cookbook, we will use Kickstarter or a similar system to raise money to do
it, and if we don't raise enough cash, the project simply dies.
> >>
> >> Comments about this?
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> >> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> >>
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40smarthealth.com
> >>
> >> This email sent to rgur...@smarthealth.com
> >
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/bastian.triller%40gmail.com
>
> This email sent to bastian.tril...@gmail.com
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to